Citroen eC3 was tested at the Global NCAP and it received a disappointing result as it scored 0-Star Rating in Adult Occupant Protection (AOP), and 1-Star Rating in Child Occupant Protection(COP).
Citroen had launched the eC3 last year in February which is an ICE version of the C3 hatchback. Citroen had sent the electric hatch for testing at the Global NCAP and the result was indeed disappointed. The model was equipped with dual airbags, seat belt load limiter and seat belt reminder. Citroen doesn’t offer ESP (even as an option), ISOFIX anchorages, seat belt pretensioners, side airbags, and seat belt reminder for the rear seats.
For latest Car Discounts, Offers, News, Updates, and More, Join Our Whatsapp Group!
In the Adult Occupant Protection evaluation, the eC3 achieved a score of 20.86 out of 34 points. While it offered commendable protection for the head and neck of both the driver and passenger, the assessment revealed weaknesses in chest protection, which were rated as both weak and poor. Furthermore, the driver experienced only marginal protection for the legs, primarily due to hazardous structures located behind the dashboard, including the steering wheel.
During the side impact test, the eC3 demonstrated marginal protection for the head, adequate protection for the chest, and good protection for the abdomen and pelvis area. However, the disparity between the results of the frontal and side impact tests resulted in a deduction of one star from the overall rating. Notably, the eC3 was not subjected to the Side Pole Impact Test as Citroen did not equip the vehicle with side airbags, failing to meet the requirements set by Global NCAP. Additionally, the absence of Electronic Stability Program (ESP), which is a minimum requirement by Global NCAP, further highlights safety concerns associated with the vehicle.
In the child occupant protection assessment, the eC3 received a score of 10.55 out of 49 points. During the test, the child seat intended for a 3-year-old was secured facing forward using the adult seat belt. Unfortunately, it failed to adequately restrain the child, resulting in excessive forward movement and contact with the vehicle’s interior in the event of a frontal collision.
On the other hand, the rearward-facing child seat designed for an 18-month-old provided better protection during frontal impacts, effectively shielding the child’s head from exposure. However, in the case of a side impact, the head remained vulnerable, leading to a lower score in this aspect.
The eC3 model lacks certain safety features crucial for child occupant protection. Notably, it does not offer 3-point seat belts for all five seats, with a lap belt being provided for the rear middle passenger. Additionally, the absence of ISOFIX anchorages and the inability to deactivate the passenger airbag when a rearward-facing child restraint system is installed in that position contributed to deductions in the assessment. Furthermore, the car only provides one suitable position for a universal child seat, further impacting its score in this category.
For latest Car Discounts, Offers, News, Updates, and More, Join Our Whatsapp Group!